New Hampshire: het statistische wonder van Clinton
De Verenigde Staten zijn het land van de ongekende mogelijkheden. De laatste jaren zijn vooral de presidentsverkiezingen een goed voorbeeld van de „ongekende mogelijkheden“ die in Amerika plaats kunnen vinden. Kandidaten weten tegen alle statistische wetten in soms net (meestal een marge van 2%) te winnen van uitgesproken favorieten. Dit jaar blijkt democratisch kandidaat Hillary Clinton een dergelijk „statistisch wonder“ te zijn. Tegen alle polls en verwachtingen in wist zij de voorverkiezing in de staat New Hampshire op haar naam te schrijven. Clinton moest in de staat een achterstand van ongeveer 12% van de stemmen goedmaken op haar directe rivaal Barack Obama. Uiteindelijk wist zij na de stembusgang met een krappe 2% voorsprong de staat op haar naam te schrijven. Een ongekende prestatie.Bij de republikeinen wist John McCain naar verwachting de winst binnen te slepen. Mit Romney, de directe concurrent eindigde twee. Verassend winnaar van de caucus in Iowa Huckabee derde.
Maar alle ogen waren op de verkiezingsavond in New Hampshire gericht op het Clinton-kamp. Zoals de Washington Post schrijft: “her campaign exceeded all reasonable expectations in the state”. Bij exitpolls wist Clinton onder kiezers met belangrijkste verkiezingspunt “verandering” een sprong te maken van 19%, terwijl ook meer vrouwen lijken te kiezen voor de vrouw Clinton. Clinton scoorde 47% van de vrouwenstemmen.
De verkiezingen verliepen niet geheel zonder incidenten. Vroeg op de avond leek het even dat de papierenstembiljetten op zouden raken. Ook melden ontevreden Ron Paul aanhangers gevallen van stemfraude.
Over het algemeen werd met stemcomputers gestemd in New Hampshire.
De uiteindelijk telling van stemmen werd verzorgd door DieBold Election Systems.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=vote%20fraud&search=Search&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&spell=1
klein voorbeeldje
(laatste post)
@Rogier
Valt wel wat af te dingen op die Paul,hoeft van mij geen president te worden.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19027.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19029.htm
en een weinig inhoudelijke reactie van hem
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19028.htm
Hij lijkt me een vrij eerlijke kandidaat die het goede voorheeft met de USA, maar ook dat kan schijn zijn natuurlijk. Toch vind ik hem de meest geschikte kandidaat.
gaat het hierover ,paul?
o.a.die propaganda op het bill gates hitlary channel ?
nee clearinghouse hoeft van mij ook niet meer
netzomin daiy kos en huffington post
omgekocht en betaald door de clitons
net als mnsbc
nou begin ik ook dat gedrag van die olberman te begrijpen
o,ja het citaat
What's more, Paul's connections to extremism go beyond the newsletters. He has given extensive interviews to the magazine of the John Birch Society, and has frequently been a guest of Alex Jones, a radio host and perhaps the most famous conspiracy theorist in America. Jones--whose recent documentary, Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, details the plans of George Pataki, David Rockefeller, and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, among others, to exterminate most of humanity and develop themselves into "superhuman" computer hybrids able to "travel throughout the cosmos"--estimates that Paul has appeared on his radio program about 40 times over the past twelve years.
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530
As you'll note, the numbers in Zogby's latest polls, for all but Clinton and Obama, seem to have been dead-on the money for both the Republicans and Democrats. Edwards, for example, was polled at 17% in Zogby's poll, and he received exactly 17% in the MSNBC numbers, with 63% of precincts reporting. So are we to believe that only those voters who preferred Obama previously, decided to change to Hillary at the last minute? I suppose so.
This election was regarded as do-or-die for Clinton, after most in the media had already written her off after her "thumpin'" in Iowa. But Tim Russert just agreed with Brokaw and Matthews that "this was the most stunning upset in the history of politics."
They are already grasping for reasons that this happened: the crying; she found her voice; the women turned out; oldline Dems showed up, etc. All reminiscent, if you ask me, of "the evangelicals who turned out at the very last minute to vote for Bush in 2004" as the Exit Poll apologists wrote in what would become conventional wisdom at the time. (Where did they get that info? The Exit Polls, they'll tell you. The same ones that they will also tell you were wildly wrong on every other count, apparently.)
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
@Rogier
Man in jurk kan me niet schelen,moet hij zelf weten ,vind dat toch niet te vergelijken met de zaken die onder Pauls naam zijn gepubliceerd.
This "Special Issue on Racial Terrorism" was hardly the first time one of Paul's publications had raised these topics. As early as December 1989, a section of his Investment Letter, titled "What To Expect for the 1990s," predicted that "Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities" because "mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white 'haves.'" Two months later, a newsletter warned of "The Coming Race War," and, in November 1990, an item advised readers, "If you live in a major city, and can leave, do so. If not, but you can have a rural retreat, for investment and refuge, buy it." In June 1991, an entry on racial disturbances in Washington, DC's Adams Morgan neighborhood was titled, "Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo." "This is only the first skirmish in the race war of the 1990s," the newsletter predicted. In an October 1992 item about urban crime, the newsletter's author--presumably Paul--wrote, "I've urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming." That same year, a newsletter described the aftermath of a basketball game in which "blacks poured into the streets of Chicago in celebration. How to celebrate? How else? They broke the windows of stores to loot." The newsletter inveighed against liberals who "want to keep white America from taking action against black crime and welfare," adding, "Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems."
Such views on race also inflected the newsletters' commentary on foreign affairs. South Africa's transition to multiracial democracy was portrayed as a "destruction of civilization" that was "the most tragic [to] ever occur on that continent, at least below the Sahara"; and, in March 1994, a month before Nelson Mandela was elected president, one item warned of an impending "South African Holocaust."
Martin Luther King Jr. earned special ire from Paul's newsletters, which attacked the civil rights leader frequently, often to justify opposition to the federal holiday named after him. ("What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it!" one newsletter complained in 1990. "We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.") In the early 1990s, a newsletter attacked the "X-Rated Martin Luther King" as a "world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours," "seduced underage girls and boys," and "made a pass at" fellow civil rights leader Ralph Abernathy. One newsletter ridiculed black activists who wanted to rename New York City after King, suggesting that "Welfaria," "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg," and "Lazyopolis" were better alternatives. The same year, King was described as "a comsymp, if not an actual party member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration."
While bashing King, the newsletters had kind words for the former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke. In a passage titled "The Duke's Victory," a newsletter celebrated Duke's 44 percent showing in the 1990 Louisiana Senate primary. "Duke lost the election," it said, "but he scared the blazes out of the Establishment." In 1991, a newsletter asked, "Is David Duke's new prominence, despite his losing the gubernatorial election, good for anti-big government forces?" The conclusion was that "our priority should be to take the anti-government, anti-tax, anti-crime, anti-welfare loafers, anti-race privilege, anti-foreign meddling message of Duke, and enclose it in a more consistent package of freedom." Duke is now returning the favor, telling me that, while he will not formally endorse any candidate, he has made information about Ron Paul available on his website.
Like blacks, gays earn plenty of animus in Paul's newsletters. They frequently quoted Paul's "old colleague," Representative William Dannemeyer--who advocated quarantining people with AIDS--praising him for "speak[ing] out fearlessly despite the organized power of the gay lobby."
Surviving the AIDS Plague--also based upon the casual-transmission thesis--and defended "parents who worry about sending their healthy kids to school with AIDS victims." Commenting on a rise in AIDS infections, one newsletter said that "gays in San Francisco do not obey the dictates of good sense," adding: "[T]hese men don't really see a reason to live past their fifties. They are not married, they have no children, and their lives are centered on new sexual partners." Also, "they enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick."
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.
"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton
Better yet, why not have voting machines based on open source software that programmers can analyze and discuss? Lots of the internet runs on open source software - anyone can look at the code and what is going on and how. Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP and Drupal - the software that the Daily Paul runs on is all open source, open to inspection, created by the community for the benefit of all.
Or even better yet, why not bring back paper voting? What is the rush to count the ballots and declare winners? Is speed more important than truth?
Who is in charge of buying these election systems and installing them, in your state, and in your town? Where is the accountability?
As I said last night, this Revolution is not over. It will never be over. Freedom is not free. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.
Reddit shows that the young people are paying attention. It is easy for some of these kids, raised in this media culture, to smell a rat. How much talk is there of vote fraud on the old media? I'm not watching TV, but I feel pretty safe in saying the answer is zero.
The question right now in my mind is: Is this still America if an honest man can't get an honest vote? How long do we keep calling this place America? To understand what is going on, there is no better book to read right now than Naomi Wolf's The End of America. The need to understand this is urgent.
The end of America has already come for many people who see the abomination that this nation has become - a nation no longer ruled by law but by powerful men and corporations. To many of us, Ron Paul was our hope. "Our last best chance," I always said, to get back to the principles upon which this country was founded. If we lose this chance, then what does America become?
We've got our work cut out for us, friends
nog meer stemmen verdwenen....het is over die hele staat hetzelfde,en er komt nog veeeel meer ,let maar op
Je kunt volstaan met een linkje.
ik was kwaad op paul 2, die begon met dat stomme copy/paste van een achterlijk artikel
ik dacht ,dat kan ik ook :)
Je kunt volstaan met een linkje.
@Antagonizer
Enorm?
De essentie (voor mij althans) uit een artikel plaatsen mag niet?Hou me toch aan het max aantal tekens etc.Maar goed antagonizer ,zal zaken inkorten.
ik was kwaad op paul 2, die begon met dat stomme copy/paste van een achterlijk artikel
@Chris
Kwaad-stomme-achterlijk.Een iets andere benadering van iemand met een tegenargument waar je het niet mee eens bent mag ook wel